IMMIGRANT ACCULTURATION
Immigration Implies Adaptation
Migrating Individuals and Groups
Host Individuals and Community
Models of Acculturation Should Explain
Interplay between Immigrant and Host Orientations
Relational Outcomes between Immigrants and Host
Unidimensional Assimilation Model
Immigrants Move Along a Continuum
Immigrant Culture ==> Biculturalism ==> Host Culture
Biculturalism Transitory
Adaptation Involves Adoption of Host Culture
Ethnocentric
Immigrants Situated Lower than Host
Adaptational Failure
Attributed to Immigrants
Overlooks How Host also Changes
Immigrant Separation
==> Negative Host Attitudes
Bidimensional Model of Acculturation
Immigrant and Host Identities Are Independent
Immigrants Must Confront 2 Issues
Is Immigrant Culture of Value and
Worth Keeping?
Is Host Culture of Value and Worth
Seeking?
Five immigrant acculturation strategies
Integration – Bicultural Identity
Assimilation – Identify with Host
Culture
Separation – Maintain Immigrant Identity
Anomie – Reject Both Cultures
Individualism – Personal Identity
Most Immigrants Endorse Integration
Acculturative Stress
Highly Correlated
with Marginalization
Highly Correlated
with Separation
Moderately Correlated
with Assimilation
Slightly Correlated
with Integration
Overlooks How Host Community Shapes Acculturation
Interactive Acculturation Model (Bourhis et al., 1997)
Acculturation Orientations of Immigrants
Acculturation Orientations of Host Community
Relational Outcomes of Immigrant x Host Orientations
Host Community Must Confront 2 Issues
Is it Okay if Immigrants Retain their
Culture?
Is it okay if Immigrants Accept Host
Culture?
Five Host Acculturation Orientations
Integration – Accept Bicultural Identity
Assimilation – Expect Adoption of
Host Culture
Segregation – Distance from Immigrant
Culture
Exclusion – Reject all Immigrants,
Identity Irrelevant
Individualism – Accept or Reject
Personal Qualities
Outcomes of Immigrant x Host Orientations
Consensual
Effective Communication
Positive Attitudes
Low Discrimination
and Acculturative Stress
Problematic
Common Problematic
Outcome
Integration – Assimilation
Host
Individualism - Immigrant Separation
Conflictual
Common Conflictual
Outcome
Immigrant Separation - Host Exclusion
Miscommunication
Negative Stereotypes
Intergroup Tension
and Violence
Predicted Relations
Differ by Immigrant
Group and Experience
Moderated by Immigrant
Vitality
Number
Prestige
Political Representation
Differ for Host
Subgroups
Gender
SES
Degree of Contact with Immigrants
Differ as Host
Conditions Change
Demographic Imbalance
Economic Downturn
DISCUSSION:
➢ Host orientation toward Arabs vs. Mexicans
➢ Predicted relations with Arabs vs. Mexicans given level
of immigrant vitality and economic and political conditions